[Interpretation/Lower Section] Lower Section[Interpretation/Special Indices] Special Indices[Interpretation/Upper Section] Upper Section
[Interpretation/Lower Section/Affect] Affect[Interpretation/Lower Section/Core] Core[Interpretation/Lower Section/Ideation] Ideation[Interpretation/Lower Section/Interpersonal] Interpersonal[Interpretation/Lower Section/Mediation] Mediation[Interpretation/Lower Section/Processing] Processing[Interpretation/Lower Section/Self Perception] Self Perception
[Interpretation/Interpersonal] a:p[Interpretation/Interpersonal] AG[Interpretation/Interpersonal] COP[Interpretation/Interpersonal] Food[Interpretation/Interpersonal] Human Content[Interpretation/Interpersonal] Isolation Index[Interpretation/Interpersonal] PER[Interpretation/Interpersonal] Pure H[Interpretation/Interpersonal] SumT
[Interpretation/Interpersonal] PER
[Interpretation/Interpersonal] PER
Aliases
- PER
- personalized answers
- personal frame
Definition
PER shows how much the person tends to justify the response from personal criteria, personal experience, or a private point of view when that style is read at the interpersonal level.
In interpretation, it suggests how much a self-referential frame shapes the person's reading of other people and relational exchange.
Interpretation
- If
PERis high, there may be greater tendency to interpret the interpersonal world through personal references rather than shared cues. - This variable can accompany rigidity, need for self-assertion, or a very private way of validating experience.
- When it appears together with high
Xu%, interpersonal reading may become even more idiosyncratic. - A low value only means this bias appears less often; it does not automatically mean the person is open or flexible.
Cautions
PERis not the same as creativity, and it does not by itself equal narcissism.- The variable does not measure simple personal opinion; it points to the way the response is supported by a personal frame.
- It should be distinguished from the coding score
PER, even though the two are related.
Cross References
PERis not enough by itself to conclude relational egocentricity.- It should be read with
a:p,HumanCont,Xu%, andH ratio.
Evidence Note
a:pHumanContXu%H ratioCOP
Evidence Note
- [Interpretation/Lower Section/Interpersonal] Interpersonal
- [Interpretation/Interpersonal] Human Content
- [Interpretation/Interpersonal] a:p
- [Coding/Special Scores] PER
- [Interpretation/Mediation] Xu%
- [Interpretation/Self Perception] H Ratio
Evidence Note
- Detailed source comparison is stored in internal provenance notes.